Pozzi, Francesca, Persico, Donatella, Fischer, Frank, Hofmann, Lena, Lindstaedt Stefanie , Cress, Ulrike, Rath Andreas S., Moskaliuk, Johannes, Weber, Nicolas, Kimmerle, Joachim, Devaurs Didier, Ney, Muriel, Gonçalves, Celso, Balacheff, Nicolas, Schwartz, Claudine, Bosson, Jean-Luc, Dillenbourg, Pierre, Jermann, Patrick, Zufferey, Guillaume, Brown, Elisabeth, Sharples, Mike, Windrum, Caroline, Specht, Marcus, Börner, Dirk, Glahn, Christian, Fiedler, Sebastian, Fisichella, Marco, Herder, Eelco, Marenzi, Ivana, Nejdl, Wolfgang, Kawese, Ricardo, Papadakis, George
2010
In this first STELLAR trend report we survey the more distant future of TEL, as reflected in the roadmaps; we compare the visions with trends in TEL research and TEL practice. This generic overview is complemented by a number of small-scale studies, which focus on a specific technology, approach or pedagogical model.
Lindstaedt Stefanie , Rath Andreas S., Devaurs Didier
2010
. Supporting learning activities during work has gained momentum fororganizations since work-integrated learning (WIL) has been shown to increaseproductivity of knowledge workers. WIL aims at fostering learning at the workplace,during work, for enhancing task performance. A key challenge for enablingtask-specific, contextualized, personalized learning and work support is to automaticallydetect the user’s task. In this paper we utilize our ontology-based usertask detection approach for studying the factors influencing task detection performance.We describe three laboratory experiments we have performed in twodomains including over 40 users and more than 500 recorded task executions.The insights gained from our evaluation are: (i) the J48 decision tree and Na¨ıveBayes classifiers perform best, (ii) six features can be isolated, which providegood classification accuracy, (iii) knowledge-intensive tasks can be classified aswell as routine tasks and (iv) a classifier trained by experts on standardized taskscan be used to classify users’ personal tasks.