Publikationen

Hier finden Sie von Know-Center MitarbeiterInnen verfasste wissenschaftliche Publikationen

2010

Kraker Peter, Fessl Angela, Lindstaedt Stefanie , Ullmann T.D., Wild F., Scott P., Duval E., Vandeputte B., Parra G., Reinhardt W., Heinze N., Nagel T., Gillet D.

Components of a Research 2.0 Infrastructure

EC-TEL 2010: Fifth European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Wolpers, M., Kirschner, P. A., Scheffel, M., Lindstaedt, S. N., Dimitrova, V., Springer, 2010

Konferenz
In this paper, we investigate the components of a Research 2.0infrastructure. We propose building blocks and their concrete implementationto leverage Research 2.0 practice and technologies in our field, including apublication feed format for exchanging publication data, a RESTful API toretrieve publication and Web 2.0 data, and a publisher suit for refining andaggregating data. We illustrate the use of this infrastructure with Research 2.0application examples ranging from a Mash-Up environment, a mobile andmultitouch application, thereby demonstrating the strength of thisinfrastructure.
2010

Lindstaedt Stefanie , Duval E., Ullmann T.D., Wild F., Scott P.

Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Research 2.0

CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS, 2010

Buch
Research2.0 is in essence a Web2.0 approach to how we do research. Research2.0 creates conversations between researchers, enables them to discuss their findings and connects them with others. Thus, Research2.0 can accelerate the diffusion of knowledge.ChallengesAs concluded during the workshop, at least four challenges are vital for future research.The first area is concerned with availability of data. Access to sanitized data and conventions on how to describe publication-related metadata provided from divergent sources are enablers for researchers to develop new views on their publications and their research area. Additional, social media data gain more and more attention. Reaching a widespread agreement about this for the field of technology-enhanced learning would be already a major step, but it is also important to focus on the next steps: what are success-critical added values driving uptake in the research community as a whole?The second area of challenges is seen in Research 2.0 practices. As technology-enhanced learning is a multidisciplinary field, practices developed in one area could be valuable for others. To extract the essence of successful multidisciplinary Research 2.0 practice though, multidimensional and longitudinal empirical work is needed. It is also an open question, if we should support practice by fostering the usage of existing tools or the development of new tools, which follow Research 2.0 principles. What makes a practice sustainable? What are the driving factors?The third challenge deals with impact. What are criteria of impact for research results (and other research artefacts) published on the Web? How can this be related to the publishing world appearing in print? Is a link equal to a citation or a download equal to a subscription? Can we develop a Research 2.0 specific position on impact measurement? This includes questions of authority, quality and re-evaluation of quality, and trust.The tension between openness and privacy spans the fourth challenge. The functionality of mash-ups often relies on the use of third-party services. What happens with the data, if this source is no longer available? What about hidden exchange of data among backend services?
2010

Duval Erik, Ullman Thomas Daniel, Wild Fridolin, Lindstaedt Stefanie , Scott Peter

Research 2.0 for TEL: four challenges

Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Research 2.0. At the 5th European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning: Sustaining TEL, 2010

Konferenz
2010

Ullmann Thomas Daniel, Wild Fridolin, Scott Peter, Duval Erik, Parra G., Reinhardt W., Heinze N., Kraker Peter, Fessl Angela, Lindstaedt Stefanie , Nagel T., Gillet D.

A science 2.0 infrastructure for technology-enhanced learning

Computer Science Education, 2010

Journal
Science 2.0 is a rather young concept and despite its short historyalready induced numerous controversial positions, oscillating between newtechnologies and new practices. Even though many TEL researchers already useScience 2.0 tools, although not always labeled as such, there is no commonlyshared practice and tools in use. Within this paper, we investigate the conceptof Science 2.0 and propose an embracing definition. From there we investigateexisting practice with pilot studies and propose a framework for further indepthstudy and elicitation of Science 2.0 practices of technology-enhancedlearning researchers. Furthermore, we propose a mash-up architecture andconcrete infrastructure to leverage Science 2.0 practice and technologies in ourfield, including the proposal of a publication feed format, a retrieval API, andthe provision of an initial set of data sources and services. We illustrate the useof this infrastructure with several Science 2.0 application examples, therebydemonstrating the strength of this infrastructure and architecture.
Kontakt Karriere

Hiermit erkläre ich ausdrücklich meine Einwilligung zum Einsatz und zur Speicherung von Cookies. Weiter Informationen finden sich unter Datenschutzerklärung

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close