Hier finden Sie von Know-Center MitarbeiterInnen verfasste wissenschaftliche Publikationen


Lindstaedt Stefanie , Kraker Peter, Wild Fridolin, Ullmann Thomas, Duval Erik, Parra Gonzalo

First experiences with a Science 2.0 infrastructure


This deliverable reports on first usage experiences and evaluations of the STELLAR Science 2.0 Infrastructure. Usage experiences were available predominantly for the "mature" part of the infrastructure provided by standard Web 2.0 tools adapted to STELLAR needs. Evaluations are provided for newly developed tools. We first provide an overview of the whole STELLAR Science 2.0 Infrastructure and the relationships between the building blocks. While the individual building blocks already benefit researchers, the integration between them is the key for a positive usage experience. The publication meta data ecosystem for example provides researchers with an easy to retrieve set of TEL related data. Tools like the ScienceTable, Muse, the STELLAR latest publication widget, and the STELLAR BuRST search show already several scenarios of how to make use of this infrastructure. Especially a strong focus on anlytical tools based on publication and social media data seem useful. In order to highlight the relevance of the infrastructure to the individual capacitiy building activties within STELLAR, the usage experiences of individual building blocks are then reported with respect to Researcher Capacity (e.g. Deliverable Wikis, More! application), Doctoral Academy Capacity (e.g. DoCoP), Community Level Capacity (e.g TELeurope), and Leadership Capacity (e.g. Meeting of Minds, Podcast Series). Here we draw from 11 scientific papers published. The reader will find an overview of all these papers in the Appendix. Based on the usage experiences and evaluations we have identified a number of ideas which might be worth considering for future developments. For example, the experiences gained with the Deliverable Wikis show how the modification of the standard Wiki history can provide useful analytical insights into the collaboration of living deliverables and can return the focus on authorship (which is intentionally masked in Wikis, because of their strong notion on the product and not on authors). We conclude with main findings and an outlook on the development plan and evaluation plan which are currently being developed and which will influence D6.6. Particularly, we close with the notion of a Personal Research Environment (PRE) which draws from the concept of Personal Learning Environments (PLE).

Windrum Caroline, Joubert Marie, Barak Noaa, Specht Marcus, De Vries Fred, Persico Donatella, Camilleri Anthony, Lindstaedt Stefanie , Kraker Peter, Herder Eelco, Wild Fridolin, Duval Erik

D5. 3.1-Report on community building with Stakeholders


This report provides the first of three annual reports on the progress of Work Package 5. It describes what has been achieved in the first year of activity related to the 5 tasks outlined in the Description of Work.Task 1 Stakeholder Analysis and Initiation of Activities. Establishment of Stakeholder Panel, monitoring tools, and metrics.Task 3 Stakeholder Needs Analysis.Elaboration and Showcasing: Two way communications with the rest of STELLAR WPs.Implementation of Synergetic Activities: Involvement in conferences/ workshops.

Duval Erik, Ullman Thomas Daniel, Wild Fridolin, Lindstaedt Stefanie , Scott Peter

Research 2.0 for TEL: four challenges

Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Research 2.0. At the 5th European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning: Sustaining TEL, 2010


Ullmann Thomas Daniel, Wild Fridolin, Scott Peter, Duval Erik, Parra G., Reinhardt W., Heinze N., Kraker Peter, Fessl Angela, Lindstaedt Stefanie , Nagel T., Gillet D.

A science 2.0 infrastructure for technology-enhanced learning

Computer Science Education, 2010

Science 2.0 is a rather young concept and despite its short historyalready induced numerous controversial positions, oscillating between newtechnologies and new practices. Even though many TEL researchers already useScience 2.0 tools, although not always labeled as such, there is no commonlyshared practice and tools in use. Within this paper, we investigate the conceptof Science 2.0 and propose an embracing definition. From there we investigateexisting practice with pilot studies and propose a framework for further indepthstudy and elicitation of Science 2.0 practices of technology-enhancedlearning researchers. Furthermore, we propose a mash-up architecture andconcrete infrastructure to leverage Science 2.0 practice and technologies in ourfield, including the proposal of a publication feed format, a retrieval API, andthe provision of an initial set of data sources and services. We illustrate the useof this infrastructure with several Science 2.0 application examples, therebydemonstrating the strength of this infrastructure and architecture.

Verbert Katrien, Duval Erik, Lindstaedt Stefanie , Gillet Denis

Context-aware recommender systems

Journal of Universal Computer Science, Springer, 2010

Kontakt Karriere

Hiermit erkläre ich ausdrücklich meine Einwilligung zum Einsatz und zur Speicherung von Cookies. Weiter Informationen finden sich unter Datenschutzerklärung

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.